Man-made global warming.... biggest myth of this century

How do we explain the last ice age and associated temperature swings last time around ... cavemen fires polluting the atmosphere?

..... Theres no doubt in my mind about the effects of pollution in the short term, but in all honesty im sceptical about this popularist idea of 'carbon neutral' and all the associated bumpf about CO2.

The whole idea of a carbon cycle is just that, its cyclical - how can the release of carbon thats already in planet (that was formally NOT stored as oil and the like) be a bad thing? It was IN the atmosphere at one point - and likewise, carbon dioxide is what vegetation thrives on ... its just poisonous to air breathers You could say thats the earths way of cyclically correcting itself.

We still have ALOT to learn about this planet (Parts of the Poles getting COLDER for instance, while other parts melt etc et - explain that)

No doubt the lefties will have a field day with this one

I shall not be baited!!

..... cameron could care less about the environment - its just pandering to the electorate with his bullshit 'watch me cycle to work' tactics. I still wouldnt vote for any party these days.

Tackling localised pollution should be more of an issue, than spending billions and billions reducing our 'footprint' from 2% to 1% while the biggest abusers (USA/India/China) could not give a stuff...... and for all we know it might not make a difference anyways.

I'd say deforestation is more of an issue than CO2 output, which plants love anyways ..

Now find a graph that plots the last cycle of climate changes against something that people think caused it

Just goes to show eh, you can find statistics to back up any point you want to make



There was a time when everyone thought the world was flat eh - and people laughed when someone dared suggest maybe it wasnt .... im really sceptical about issues like these - not saying they dont exist as threats, or that we shouldnt be extremely mindful about them tho ...

I wouldn't say it was man-made, moreso man-contributory.

The temperature of earth has fluctuated in the past, but that doesn't mean we can go about all lackadaisical and pollute the way we do. Even if it doesn't cause the amount of damage some sources suggest it isn't healthy at all or beneficial to the planet and nature.

Eutrophication, air pollution, deforestation, mud slides, smog, animal extinction, contaminating the sea, ozone depletion, the list is endless but I'm sure we're in no way responsible for any of those either.

Theres a world of difference between releasing CO2 into the atmosphere by burning fossil fuels ..... and destroying a local river by dumping toxic waste into it and killing all the wildlife in one fell swoop.

Taking the individual loss of life ASIDE ....

..... Whats so bad about global warming?

We've had it before, we are due it again ..... why fight nature?