If the money was right but not to Man Ure , or the Master Bates lot , we would be stregthning the opposition n weakining ourseleves in the process, if we sell him it should be to a foreign club!! Man utd would never have sold Beckham to another Prem Club !! Quote from Fat Fred today :: "Dyer is not for sale," said Shepherd at a press conference ahead of the Premier League Asia Cup in Malaysia. "We are building a squad of young players. We have the best manager in the Premier League and we're going to support Bobby (Robson) all we can, so we're not going to sell Dyer. "I'd sell my granny if the price was right, but we'd be talking ridiculous money."
but if we got rid off dyer then we wud need another top midfielder to replace him and i doubt theres any1 that wud come to us with the same ability as dyer or better...our defence is strong, just need a top right back we cud do with a forward, we were ment to b gettin kluivert but fuck knows whats goin on with that transfer
think he's staying at barca. bowyer would fill dyer's boots with ease. take into account young ambrose. £25 million imo is to good to miss out on
How about Beattie we need another top class striker , and he doesnt seem to be to impressed with Bridge leaving Southampton
yep he's young and has alot of talent and his team is in division 1...we shud buy him also joe cole and carrick..
it wud b very nice, we wud hav loads of youngsters of the future, newcastle wud b a top team in the future if we keep on signing young players
we should not sell dyer. he is too important to the team. and lee bowyer could not fill his shoes at all