just been

just been

watching a programme about animal testing


the pro's and cons and the people who make it there jobs 2 go on marches and protest or stand up for what they belive in

i mean what do u lot feel about this sorta issue?


i feel that basicly if the protesters just got a fucking job and stopped banging on about animals that wud make the world a better place not shouting and terrorising researchers who only try 2 make human life better

Re: just been

:;,.!?()

Re: just been

What's wrong with it? Not all animal testing makes human life better and I'm not opposed to it when it's the only option. But, in some cases, it isn't the only option. This is especially the case when they test shampoos etc on animals. There's just no need.

if its beneficial in treating disease then im for it, if its for cosmetics then im against it. im also for stem cell research

so in english u support or not?

Re: Re: just been

wey i do agree there shampoos and that arnt really needed well not needed at all

u see that wasent hard!

uve got 2 remember always use laymens terms for me

eSPECIALly Jimi

how u figure that then,


i think u misread what he was saying he wasent dumbening it down for me in that last thread,

u thick turd

ohh the irony

less of it

would you torture your favourite pet to save some random stranger?

You can and they do.

Although I do support animal testing.

I support it where absolutely necessary for medical research. Not for cosmetics.

We have plenty of shampoos, make up etc without needing to test new ingredients on animals. There are enough companies that manage to introduce new products without animal testing to show that it isn't necessary for many things anyway.

surely the point is that cosmetics are unnecessary whereas drugs are vital

and thousands of chemicals are produced and used without any testing at all. why just cosmetics?

I'm trying to imagine the animal testing of viagra