Should the NHS refuse Treatment? Anyone watch Panorama last night? The abuse NHS workers come under is appauling - should they be able to refuse treatment for abusive patients? it's a fine line - who would draw it? on what ground would they use to refuse treatment? i'd say YES. Someone chins you - turf them into the car park.
the should have charver/scally hospitals for those types. like they have different off licences - 'booze buster' with it's bullet proof windows for the chavs
If I worked for the nhs I wouldn't want to be dealing with violent patients but at the same time it would be hard to refuse when it's treatment they need in order to survive. That guy on dialysis was a fucking prick but refusing him treatment would mean he died. Did he deserve to die cos of his behaviour? Probably not
The only people who would be abusive to nurses are charver types, so to speed up the process, just stab them in the face when they come into the hospital. Problem solved.
It's hard to decide really, what about people who are hysterical from shock, what do you do there just let them sit in casualty until the fall unconscious then treat them?! In theory I'd say doctors and nurses should have the right to refuse treatment but in practise it's going to be hard to implement a fair, standard practise throughout the NHS
in most cases jab em with general anaesthetic, sort em oot then tie them to a railing in the shittest area of town
there was one next to my old house called 'backy booze and bullets' - i rekon they should be given so many chances then refused, no real way of getting around it though
if u refuse 2 treat sum1 and they die YOUR FUCKED i.e the person had been in a fight and had a bottle off his head and he is mortal and abusive and the nurses give him the spanish archer and he dies of a hemerage or summit
yeah i don't think you could actually refuse them. just should be able to haha after so many warnings . thats why i said no real way of getting around it though
