It's doing my head in now :lol:
I'm having a hard time getting my head around this. I'm assuming that no matter how powerful the thrust of the engines is, the plane has to move...
that is the worst attempt at a controlled experiment ever! lol.
Reasons why arguments FOR takeoff are wrong?
Shrink your head.
Oh well then. Who's up for tea and custard creams?
What is growing up? Refusing to go sledging because you're scared to look 'uncool' for your age or because you suddenly stop enjoying bombing down...
well.. skinning would hurt a lot more i guess :p
The cruelty that is a result of the fur trade. *slap*
I dont understand what that is proving apart from the fact that airflow is generated with movement :confused: Or is that what you meant? :dunce:
we slaughter cows and eat them. Shit happens :p On a serious note though, i don't think any animals should be killed for...
Thats how the arguements started. I still don't get it though. If the conveyor is set to match the speed of wheels, moving 20 mph 'forward'...
However, take a look at this site (not the one i was on last night). http://forums.somethingawful.com/showthread.php?s=&threadid=1723836
cocc says it all really.. more for the money.
Also, cats on ketamine :lol:
I fail to believe this kind of thing would go unnoticed in New York.
This is a quote from someone that sums it up really.. "If the conveyer is moving at a linear velocity exactly opposite to the wheel's angular...
The reason the argument has taken off (hah) so much is because people are arguing over whether or not the plane will move forward first, which...
Re: Re: Re: trapped wind It sounds as if you'd get a warm satisfaction from farting on them, no?
Thats what i said. There are some seriously intelligent people on the site i was on though as the majority are in advanced IT jobs as coders or...
Separate names with a comma.
