Abortion

It's something I have thought quite a lot about and I stand by everything I have posted.

Anyway, time for another burger.

I didnt want it to turn into a ruck, shuda known better

The thing is Craig if thats what you beleive it really is nobody else place to tell you if its right or wrong because thats what you think and nobody else will change your opinion. The only thing I think you were far too harsh on is calling women who go ahead with abortion "murderers"...Obviously I can't imagine at all how hard it would be to have this done and must be very very traumatic for a woman to go through but at the end of the day you see on the news and read in magazines all the time about children who are beat and abused..would you really rather children are brought up in these conditions?

That's a much more rational way of getting a point across than acting like Lizzie Bardsley and saying you'd slap me.

It very much comes down to whether you view the fertilized egg as a child from day one. I do therefore I view abortion as killing a child.

I know what you mean, but surely you have to understand some of the reasons why women do this rather than calling them murderers? Just like I dont agree with what your saying but I do understand your point..

I do understand the difficulties that woman with unwanted pregancies face but I also think adoption is a good solution.

Yeah I do agree adoption is a good solution but I think if I knew I wouldn't be able to cope with a child and then went through with it to give up for adoption..I doubt I would be able to give my child away once it was born and I had held it meaning keeping the child even though I could not physically cope...if that makes sense

Other people have touched on it, other peeps have said it, but here's my 10p worth.

The legal medical termination of an unborn feteous is not 'murder'. Nor is a pre 22 wk unborn feteous a baby.

People are rightly entitled to their opinions, and I'm not judging, but to say that an abortion amounts to murder is wrong. Implying the involvment of the parent(s) and medical professionals of being accessories/murderers is wrong.

Some people wont be able to do that tho. What about a young 16 year old or something. She's gonna go thru her pregnancy at school? How harsh much that be??! There are loads a circumstances where adoption wouldnt be possible.

Please dont come back with "well she shouldnt have shagged about" cos not everyone who falls pregnant in error is a slapper who shags about using no protection.

Its just a typical backwards religious view on something i wish the church would stop brainwashing people with there drivel

So if a female doesnt use protection wot would you call her then?



surely a woman realizes that if she doesnt make sure there is protection shes always going to risk getting pregnent.

people say it takes two to tango but a woman can always say no and keep her legs closed unless she is raped.

Contraception is not 100% what if she uses it and becomes pregnant whos fault is it then

No form of contreception is 100% reliable.

It does take 2 to tango? Should women never have sex incase they get pregnant? I fail to see exactly what point ur making?

There's a lot of cases where protection has been used it just hasn't worked, I know a few people on the pill who took it right all the time but still manage to get pregnant, the only 100% effective contraception is not having sex. So when people are on about jsut use protection, you have to remember it doesn't always work due to noone's fault.

a woman should make sure protection is used and take the pill.

But what if that doesnt work? A condom can easily split and the pill isnt 100% effective?

if that doesnt work then you have tried your best. Wot are you saying that theres not point using condoms or taking the pill cos its not 100% effective?

It should be both parners responsibility and no protection is 100% you dweeb...

if its no ones falult then why should you take it out on the unborn baby and kill it?