Invisible Empire..

Like.

Rory, @Rossy has a point. You say you believe all of this stuff and it convinces you that there is a NWO, yet when everyone on here starts slating it, you're unable to provide a convincing argument to support your point of view? If it was as plausible as you make out, you wouldn't have any problem defending it.

@BRID and @forks can put their points across (and do so) in the face of criticism, yet the closest you come to a defence is that "our brains are too small to take in all of this shit" as per your deleted posts.

My opinion? This world has a population of nearly 7 billion people, I fail to see how any covert or overt organisation (numbering even into the hundreds of thousands or millions) is incapable of holding control or power over all of them. It's not doubt in your beliefs or those of these conspiracy theorists, it's because of the sheer logistics involved in that level of control - its virtually impossible to keep concealed or to make it work effectively.

Look up Occam's Razor (scientific principle). The simplest explanation is most likely the correct one (although not always the most accurate).

I believe if publicly visible, powerful organisations such as the UN, Arab League, NATO, and others are incapable of exercising world control in the manner that you believe these smaller, more covert organisations are capable of doing, then it is physically impossible and improbable. The UN/Nato in particular have proved that they are toothless and ineffective in the face of a crisis (Libya, Yugoslavia, Kosovo, Iraq pt 2, Iran, Syria, the Middle East etc) and it takes them weeks and months to respond to a serious problem. And both organisations are made up of representatives of the majority of nations/governments on this planet. A smaller secret society would have no chance. The more people that are involved, the more scope and ability they provide for control of others, but at a disadvantage - more people try to push their own agendas.

Saying that our skulls are too small to take it all in is a pretty pathetic argument - a lot of the users on this board are educated, open-minded, and capable of critical reasoning and thought (myself included). If the facts, theories and arguments you've laid out were so convincing, they would stand up to scrutiny by anyone, including the users of this site

Going back to Occam's Razor, and comparing it to this video, the author of the youtube clip is taking facts and factual events and removing their context, then using them to argue something completely unrelated. We know that winter happens every year, and we know that birds fly south before winter, but if I remove the context from both events, I could argue that birds flying south every year causes winter to happen. Just because two events are linked does not mean one causes the other. Correlation does not imply causation

I think along the same lines as this. it's not conspiracy, it's mostly true.... or is it.......