middle east

Discussion in 'News & Current Affairs' started by forks, Aug 21, 2006.

Users Viewing Thread (Users: 0, Guests: 0)

  1. Yosef Ha'Kohain

    Yosef Ha'Kohain Registered User

    Joined:
    Nov 11, 2001
    Messages:
    20,386
    Likes Received:
    5
    Location:
    Zion
    The current government were elected for their hardline stance.

    But I would fully support Hamas if they were to revise their raison d'etre.


    Fuck the international pressure and disarm Hizbu'llah... Once Hizbu'llah have been disabled, work with the Lebanese Government to rebuild the nation and change public opinion.

    Under the current climate the Lebanese hatred for Israel is over shadowed by their support of Hizbullah. A 15,000 strong UN force will not be able to do what a more advanced and better trained 30,000 strong Israeli force failed to.

    Its not a case of wondering if Hizbullah will attack again, its a case of waiting for their next strike.
  2. Yosef Ha'Kohain

    Yosef Ha'Kohain Registered User

    Joined:
    Nov 11, 2001
    Messages:
    20,386
    Likes Received:
    5
    Location:
    Zion
    Effectively yes.

    I'd rather see high military casualties (on either side) than civilian casualties... The next Hizbu'llah attack will be far more vicious and bring much more bloodshed.

    Its better to take care of Hizbullah now with one blow, than witnessed a prolonged campaign similar to what happened in Iraq (had we taken care of Saddam the first time) … If Hizbullah is left to their own devices this problem will not amend itself.

    Can you cite your sources?

    Andy you're nuts... Do you know the prisoners Hizbullah want releasing?

    Can I ask what exactly benefits Israel in your proposal? Hizbullah launch an attack on Israel and you suggest that Israel meet all of their demands and admit defeat?!?!?!
  3. Yosef Ha'Kohain

    Yosef Ha'Kohain Registered User

    Joined:
    Nov 11, 2001
    Messages:
    20,386
    Likes Received:
    5
    Location:
    Zion
    Support for Hizbu'llah is a new thing and isn't really relevant to the disarming of them - civilian populations moved out as Israel moved in.

    As for relying on foreign weapons, we thrashed the Arabs with smuggled weapons 60 years ago, we now manufacture our own weapons and have the most powerful army in the middle east.

    Who exactly are we dependent on? A common left wing myth is that israel needs the west... this is a total fabrication.

    Arial attacks cannot win wars, Vietnam proved this... It is an American styled way of fighting - the only way to win wars is through ground troops and Israel deployed its ground troops too late into the conflict.

    Andy if the IRA launched thousands of ballistic missiles into the UK from Ireland demanding that we released every prisoner.... would you meet these demands?

    No.

    What you're suggesting is insanity, Israel did not provoke this conflict, nor did Israel want this conflict... There is nothing to negotiate with Hizbullah - their only objective is the destruction of Israel.... How the fuck can you negotiate with someone who's only objective is your total destruction?

    Do you meet them half way and chop off your arms?
  4. dano

    dano

    Joined:
    Jun 19, 2006
    Messages:
    116
    Likes Received:
    3
    Thats a lovely potted history of Iran there Joe, unfortuantely like most of the rot you cite it misses out a huge chunk of history and context. Your right in some respects Iran did have a progressive, democratically elected government, but it was overthrown in the 50's by a combination of the Americans and the British who installed the Shah, who proceeded to rule the country through one of history's most brutal secret police forces, thereby by setting the scene for the Islamic Revolution.

    By the way, if there is a Lebanese hatred of Israel, theres a tiny posibbility that it might have been fuelled by the 30'000 people killed in Lebanon by Israel over the last 30 years.
  5. Yosef Ha'Kohain

    Yosef Ha'Kohain Registered User

    Joined:
    Nov 11, 2001
    Messages:
    20,386
    Likes Received:
    5
    Location:
    Zion
    is that not what i said?

    "forced modernisation" I believe were my actual words.

    Dano cite your sources on your death toll.
  6. dano

    dano

    Joined:
    Jun 19, 2006
    Messages:
    116
    Likes Received:
    3
    True, but you neglect to mention the context and the history which created the conditions for Khomeni and his band of fruit loops to take power. Your right the Shah did try to force modernity on Iran, but he was no benevolent dicatator he was a murderous scumbag, installed, maintained, encouraged and armed by the west, this in no small part fuels anti-western sentiment in Iran. Incidentally, Israel were selling arms to Iran and the Shah for years, this actually continued after the Revolution, i know you'll have a fit about that one, but honestly that is true.

    The Lebanese death toll i cite is to be frank an estimate, taken from various international relations text's, from all parts of the poltical scene. It is very hard to get hold of a definitive total, for instance some texts cite 30'000 dead in the 82 invasion, some cite 10'000, add to this thousands of operations in the 70's, the late 70's invasion, the 86 invasion, the 'Grapes of Wrath' operation, you get 'about' 30'000 dead.
  7. Yosef Ha'Kohain

    Yosef Ha'Kohain Registered User

    Joined:
    Nov 11, 2001
    Messages:
    20,386
    Likes Received:
    5
    Location:
    Zion
    Israel sold arms to Iran as like itself it was a non Arab state surrounded by a sea of hatred... Israel and the west misjudged the true implementations of aiding an Isalmic Fundamentalist government.

    You fail to mention the 50,000 killed by organisations like Hizbullah and the PLO... But that wouldn't aid your efforts of tarring Israel as the evilest state on the face of the earth ;)

    Your figures seem well out and do not account for militant deaths: In the '82 war the Beirut newspaper An Nahar stated that over 10,000 military personnel (PLO, Syrian, and others) had been killed by Israel.

    The majority of these militants were not native to Lebanon and would not act as a catalyst to fuel hatred... I'm not denying that Israel hatred existed in Lebanon proir to 2006 - but the country was divided in two - Israel had many supporters within Lebanon.
  8. dano

    dano

    Joined:
    Jun 19, 2006
    Messages:
    116
    Likes Received:
    3
    " You fail to mention the 50,000 killed by organisations like Hizbullah and the PLO..."

    come on joe, give us a laugh, lets have your sources on that one.
  9. Yosef Ha'Kohain

    Yosef Ha'Kohain Registered User

    Joined:
    Nov 11, 2001
    Messages:
    20,386
    Likes Received:
    5
    Location:
    Zion
    genocide watch.
  10. dano

    dano

    Joined:
    Jun 19, 2006
    Messages:
    116
    Likes Received:
    3
    are you sure? could you post the links?
  11. forks

    forks still not dead

    Joined:
    Nov 21, 2005
    Messages:
    4,057
    Likes Received:
    142
    Location:
    hurtling towards nirvana
    I constantly address these issues but you don't want to hear any view point which might be anti Israeli. I think that is the definition of a bigot if we are into name calling:(
  12. forks

    forks still not dead

    Joined:
    Nov 21, 2005
    Messages:
    4,057
    Likes Received:
    142
    Location:
    hurtling towards nirvana
    No.:up:
    The Viet Cong being the prime examples. If they keep the support of the people they win every time.
  13. Yosef Ha'Kohain

    Yosef Ha'Kohain Registered User

    Joined:
    Nov 11, 2001
    Messages:
    20,386
    Likes Received:
    5
    Location:
    Zion
    The majority of wars have been initiated by Arab states.
    and lost by them


    What does the verdict of a conflict have to do with the aspirations those nations? You accept that the majority of the wars are waged by the Arab states - but tar Israel as the evil state because it defeats it’s enemies in these attacks.

    Does that not strike you as nuts?

    yes because they have no cluster bombs no air force no tanks. just home made bombs. Israel is a state with all the state apparatus and power. It is grotesquely uneven

    Home made bombs? You're living in a fantasy world - Iraq fired 39 scuds into Israel, Hizbullah fired thousands of Fajr-3's into Israel, almost every major war has involved advanced air strikes on Israeli soil... The terror campaigns you describe go hand in hand with the military campaigns that often see Israeli civilians as their target.

    The majority of peace initiatives have been supported or created by Israel.
    and they have all foundered because they did not go far enough


    Not go far enough?

    Forks, Israel completely pulled out of the Lebanon! How is that not going far enough? Yet despite this admirable move Hizbullah took advantage of this Israeli retreat and used it create a phenomenal Israeli attacking machine…. And 6 years later they struck.

    Israel completely pulled out of the Gaza Strip, created the PA, armed the Palestinian Police and funded the service infrastructure that populations rely on, but instead of recognising Israel’s efforts and working with the Israeli’s to create a Palestinian state that would leave both nations in a stable and secure environment - the Palestinians used these efforts to attack Israel.

    Forks peace processes work in stages, dialogue leads to actions and actions lead to further actions… Israel has always been willing to engage in this process, but their efforts are consistently met with destructive blows from the Arabs they wish to seek peace with.

    The majority of the Arab states wish to drive the Jews into the sea.
    why is this so? Egypt, Jordan, Lebanon (until the recent war) kuwait, Oman Dubai, Tunisia, don't and even the ones who do could not sustain that position were Israel to treat the palestinians like human beings. and make peace not war


    You get me so fucking wound up.

    Palestinian refugees live in far worse conditions in the Lebanese, Syrian and Jordanian camps than they do in the Gaza Strip and West Bank, they are regularly abused by their host nations and treated like untermensch. If this conflict revolved around a humanitarian core then surely we would see the status of such refugees elevated in these host nations?

    You consciously choose to ignore the reality of the conflict. Prior to your accusations of alleged mistreatment that the Palestinians suffer, the Arab states regularly waged war on Israel… What was their cause then and why would this cause of disappeared?
  14. Yosef Ha'Kohain

    Yosef Ha'Kohain Registered User

    Joined:
    Nov 11, 2001
    Messages:
    20,386
    Likes Received:
    5
    Location:
    Zion
    With the exception of Vietnam - there have also been no successful campaigns.

    Guerrilla forces tend to be able to effectively bite at the ankles of large military forces, but they are unable to deliver fatal blows to such forces... Take Afghanistan - despite the Mujahideens resistance in around 20 years they had only killed 15,000 troops (almost 2 million Afghans/Mujahideen had fallen)... Guerrilla Warfare is unable to defeat powerful armies - it just resists them.
  15. Yosef Ha'Kohain

    Yosef Ha'Kohain Registered User

    Joined:
    Nov 11, 2001
    Messages:
    20,386
    Likes Received:
    5
    Location:
    Zion
    :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :rolleyes:
  16. Yosef Ha'Kohain

    Yosef Ha'Kohain Registered User

    Joined:
    Nov 11, 2001
    Messages:
    20,386
    Likes Received:
    5
    Location:
    Zion
    There is a substantial difference between a militia surviving and the disabling of a militias capability launch ballistic attacks on foreign soil.

    I never once suggested that Israel could obliterate Hizbu'llah?!?!?!



    Israel are not waging a PR campaign - they're protecting their borders.... Its not a case of winning or losing a media battle!

    This goes to show what a calculated attack it was, Hizbu'llah don't raise billions of dollars from Iran overnight.... This is a carefully thought through campaign which could ultimately see Hizbullah install an Islamic republic in Lebanon.... Great news for Israel.

    Which is why Israel should not of agreed to the ceasefire.
  17. Yosef Ha'Kohain

    Yosef Ha'Kohain Registered User

    Joined:
    Nov 11, 2001
    Messages:
    20,386
    Likes Received:
    5
    Location:
    Zion
    To disable their ability to launch balisitic attacks on Israel.



    It would of prevented them from being able to launch further attacks on Israel! This ceasefire will not last - Hizbu'llah will re-arm and when they are in a strong enough position they will strike again.

    Historically Hizbu'llahs objective was the resistance of an Israeli occupation, however over the course of history it's raison d'etre has evolved into the total destruction of Israel (along with the establishment of an Islamic republic in Lebanon), this ambition is confirmed with comments like the one below:

    "Hezbollah's struggle will continue until the final destruction of the Zionist entity". Hassan Nasrallah. al- Manar Television,May 7, 1998

    Because Israel have agreed to the ceasefire they must sitr and wait for Hizbu'llah to attack again... And this attack will come.

    Unless you think the ceasefire will actually bring peace?!?!?
  18. Yosef Ha'Kohain

    Yosef Ha'Kohain Registered User

    Joined:
    Nov 11, 2001
    Messages:
    20,386
    Likes Received:
    5
    Location:
    Zion
    No as I've stated countless times, Israel take out Israel immidiate threat then work with the Lebanese government to permenantly erase the threat.

    LOL!

    You're joking right? the majority of Israel didn't want to agree to a ceasefire... Forget about the international consensus as thats always been biased against Israel.



    Israel handed back the Gaza Strip and attacks on Israel increased!

    You make the common mistake of believing that Hizbullah and Hamas are freedom fighters, if they were freedom fighters they would be fighting for freedom - this is not the case... they are fighting for the destruction of Israel.

    There is no middle ground.
  19. Yosef Ha'Kohain

    Yosef Ha'Kohain Registered User

    Joined:
    Nov 11, 2001
    Messages:
    20,386
    Likes Received:
    5
    Location:
    Zion
    "Israel will exist and will continue to exist until Islam will obliterate it, just as it obliterated others before it."

    "The Day of Judgement will not come about until Moslems fight the Jews (killing the Jews), when the Jew will hide behind stones and trees. The stones and trees will say O Moslems, O Abdulla, there is a Jew behind me, come and kill him. " (related by al-Bukhari and Moslem).

    Israel, Judaism and Jews challenge Islam and the Moslem people. "May the cowards never sleep."


    How is that in any shape or form the words of freedom fighters?
  20. Yosef Ha'Kohain

    Yosef Ha'Kohain Registered User

    Joined:
    Nov 11, 2001
    Messages:
    20,386
    Likes Received:
    5
    Location:
    Zion
    :lol: :lol:

    I was very naive to the middle east, I interpreted the struggle as a westerner - assigning western values and western reactions to muslim extremists.... After reading countless books, websites and papers on the struggle I am now of a much more informed mind... You cannot negotiate with fundamenatlism.

    Infact I'll lay down the challenge - give me an example of muslim fundamentalist that have comprised their raison d'etre in the name of peace ;)

Share This Page