muslims

Far less than have been killed during the years since Iraq was invaded. They've gone from bad to worse in terms of human loss.

they could of had the best in the world, if sadman didn't build palaces made from gold.

Errm NO!

Saudi? Kuwait? pour example

Public spending was high....


Every country in the world spends extravagent amounts of money on such things, why don't we sell Buckingham Palace and all the other Royal estates and give the money to the homeless?

yeah but if he stayed in power his killing would have gone on forever.

Half of the country was western educated u fool!!!!

Erm yes, you have interpreted that as being the Richest country with the higest GDP which I did not say!! I'm talking about money spent on healthcare, education, roads, airports etc etc

It would have went on for the worst, if Saddam had stepped down, Uday would have taken over, and he was 100 times worse than saddam

right, and there is bright future for the death toll in Iraq at the moment!

public spending? building yourself a gold house isn't public spending, its buying yourself stuff from the countries money.

You don't see blair buying himself an island so he can build himself a house do you

solution:- Deport all muslims

There would be if they would stop blowing themselves up every other fucking day

How can you compare football hooligans and lads who stare at you in the pub to people who bomb tubes and fly aeroplanes into skyscrapers "in the name of allah"??

i know but if you think about it the people doing all the killing is those people that would have been under sadmans rein

Do you have any clue what your talking about ??

I wasn't giving that as an example of public spending!! I'm saying that as well as building palaces a lot of money was being spent on the public

What is the difference between saying that and saying "well there wouldn't be any killings if Saddams men stopped shooting the Kurds"??

So what you are saying from that is that there were killings under Saddam, and there are killings after....what exactly is your point?

leon that just isn't true, Saddam lead an evil regime but he didn't come close the hardships Iraqi's had inflicted on them from the west, sanctions lead to 1.2 million deaths, the latest war lead to the deaths of 30,000... The vast majority of the Iraqi population had a much higher standard of living before the wars.

And how does a countrys gdp reflect employment? It reflects how wealthy they are not how many people work (btw they have a gdp of 89,800,000,000 - which places them just below new zealand).

not forgetting the irish that burnt down the british embassy