September 11

US capitalist.

If it wasn't a terrorist attack - it was an inside job
If the intelligence agencies had advanced warnings - they have blood on their hands
If it was a terrorist attack - it was a reaction to capitalist exploitation

Whatever happened some degree of blame must fall upon the US establishment.

the people who do have a say made billions out of the war (whether they were involved or not)

But they could and should have acted sooner

intelligence agencies - surely the final words are down to the president in cases of such info coming to light...

i can believe they have blood on their hands too but the reason no one has been taken to court is cos bush/clinton said no & dismissed the info presented to them....

it may of been in their interests not to act sooner.

Is this David Icke propaganda?

you give the president too much status, he is but a puppet to much powerfuller entities.

arrrr.... :think:

hmmm.....you've got my mind boggling

lol it usually takes more than one sentence

It was in the publics interest to act sooner. To me it would make sense to have got Osama when they had the chance early on instead of choosing not to do anything, the hijacking happening then starting a war which still, years on from then is far from over and making more terrorists more determined to act

I think she means the Bush and Clinton administrations

A president is only as good as his advisors. One man cannot run a whole country. Bush can't even string a sentence together properly

If you look at who has benefited from the Afghan/Iraq wars its the military industry, the energy industry and the future of the US economy.

Those with the power to act on intelligence would potentially gain more if they turned a blind eye to a terrorist attack on US soil, it may of been in the interest of the US public - but when has the US public had any real impact on the governing of their country

I'm sorry I often say that Israel has blood on its hand... placing the blame entirely on the shoulders of terrorist groups like Hamas is insanity.

The question isn't whether the US has blood on its hands, its a question of how much blood they have on their hands.

Fair enough they had reasons to act the way they did but it doesn't make it right. They come across as not giving a shit about their people. People rarely look at the bigger picture

Hizb'ullah launched an unprovoked attack for their own political gain.... Islamic terrorist launched an attack on America after decades of western exploitation.

I'm not saying the attacks were justified - I'm saying that some of the blame falls upon the US... To suggest that 1 party has to be entirely guilty and the other entirely innocent is bonkers.

Reet oh! Just because I choose to remember what happened that day doesn't make me a loser, like yourself.

You would be the first to complain if no-one remembered an event like terroists bombing your street would you?

http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=7866929448192753501&hl=en

this should clear things up for everyone

there are huge holes in many of the loose change theories.

well it has me convinced