the Illuminati

moved for added fun

The British Broadcasting Conspiracy are also not to be trusted...

They reported that WTC7 had collapsed 20 minutes before it even did...

Then 5 minute beore it's actual collapse the TV's went all fuzzy & they 'Lost connection'.

Then guess what....

Yip, WTC7 was also pulverized into it's own footprint in virtually freefall speed.


Lucky guess... or fed infomation too early without realising the time differences in different parts of the world? I no longer pay my TV license.

[ame="http://www.metacafe.com/watch/450679/bbc_reported_building_7_had_collapsed_20_minutes_before_it_fell/"]BBC Reported Building 7 Had Collapsed 20 Minutes Before It Fell - Video[/ame]

rolling news programmes constantly get stuff wrong, and get glitches especially when major stories break and everyone in the newsroom goes into hyper mode.
What do you deduce from your facts?

1 -the whole of the BBC news gathering team are in on the conspiracy. They are all journalists but despite that they forgo the most major scoop of their lives in order to protect the Illuminati

2 - these super conspirers forget there is a time difference between London and New York

3- They all know the towers have been wired secretly with enough explosives to bring them down and what time this will happen. They report it has fallen based on this knowledge despite having seen no evidence, secure in the knowledge that the super conspirers never fail

4- the second towers collapse was so obviously as a result of an explosion that TV viewers exposed to the footage would be able to tell that, and realise they were looking at a conspiracy, so they deliberately 'lost' the connection in order to conceal this fact. Despite every other news organisation showing it repeatedly and in slow motion.

OR it was all a cock up based on faulty info at the time?

and whats all this freefall speed rubbish?
If you drop a lump of concrete from a height it drops at freefall speed. What's the problem? what speed do you expect it to fall at?
The construction method used in the twin towers was such that one floor collapsing on top of the one below was sufficient to cause that ones collapse and so on increasing in force as more and more floors collapsed on top. That is also the reason it fell in it's own footprint.
Incidentally why would the conspiritors care if it dropped in it's own footprint. If they were out to cause max damage for max effect it would have been better to let them topple over and smash half of manhatten to bits

graham - did u plan it all?

Glitches?

They reported a building had collapsed 20 minutes before it even had.


THEN IT DID.

cause the reports coming from 'ground zero' were suggesting it was in a bad way maybe and it was about to collapse? they had to move a treatment centre cause the building was at risk of collapse. there was a lot of confusion on that day, many many reports from witnesses, police, fire crews, the illuminati - words/information was bound to get messed up - come on - it's common sense!!!! u can't suggest ALL of the BBC are in on it now - who else is there?

Lol, it's not rubbish mate it's Physics!!

Near the surface of the Earth, Earth's gravity will produce a downward acceleration of 32 feet per second per second.
What that means is that an object, after falling one second, will be falling at 32 ft/sec.

After the 2nd second, it will be falling at 64 ft/sec.
After the 3rd second, it will be falling at 96 ft/sec.
And so on.

Further, since gravity's acceleration is constant, and it's falling at 32 ft/sec after one second has elapsed, we know that it has averaged 16 ft/sec for the entire distance, which, after one second, is 16 feet.
Simple free fall equation:
Velocity = Gravity x Time
and
Distance = 1/2 x Gravity x Time(squared)
So if we want to know how far the object has free-fallen after 3 seconds:
Distance = 1/2 x 32 x 9 = 144 feet
So after 3 seconds, in Earth's gravity, an object will have fallen 144 feet and will be falling at 96 ft/sec.

Free-falling from WTC heights
The towers were 1350 and 1360 feet tall. So let's start by using our trusty free-fall equation to see how long it should take an object to free-fall from the towers' former height.

Distance = 1/2 x Gravity x Time(squared)
or
2 x Distance = Gravity x Time(squared)
Time(squared) = (2 x Distance) / Gravity
Time(squared) = 2710 / 32 = 84.7
Time = 9.2

The equation tells us that it will take 9.2 seconds to free-fall to the ground from the towers' former height.
Using our simpler equation, V = GT, you'll see that at 9.2 seconds, in order to reach the ground in 9.2 seconds, the free-falling object's velocity must be about 295 ft/sec, which is just over 200 mph.

But that can only occur in a vacuum.

Since the WTC was at sea level, in Earth's atmosphere, you might be able to imagine how much air resistance that represents. (Think about putting your arm out the window of a car moving half that fast!) Most free-falling objects would reach their terminal velocity long before they reached 200 mph. For example, the terminal velocity of the free-falling guys that jumped from the TT's was around 120mph. The terminal velocity of a free-falling cat is around 60mph.
Therefore, air resistance alone will make it take longer than 10 seconds for gravity to pull an object to the ground from the towers' former height.


On page 305 of the 9/11 Commission Report, we are told, in the government's "complete and final report" of 9/11, that the South Tower collapsed in 10 seconds. Videos confirm that it fell unnaturally, if not precisely, fast.
But as we've just determined, that's free-fall time. That's close to the free-fall time in a vacuum, and an exceptionally rapid free-fall time through air.
But the "collapse" proceeded "through" the lower stories of the tower. Those undamaged floors below the impact zone would have offered resistance that is thousands of times greater than air. Recall that those lower stories had successfully supported the mass of the tower for 30 years.

Air can't do that.

Can you possibly imagine the supposedly-undamaged lower floors getting out of the way of the upper floors as effortlessly as air would? Can you possibly imagine the lower stories slowing any kind of fall of the upper floors less than would, say, a parachute? (And what energy source could have reduced the height of (most of) the columns, top-down, at the same rate?
What is certain, beyond any shadow of a doubt, is that the towers could not have collapsed gravitationally, through intact lower stories, as rapidly as was observed on 9/11.

Not even close!

2 Planes crashed into 2 different buildings on different floor levels, both with different amounts of fuel in their engines.

Yet 3 buildings collapsed as a result in (roughly) the exact same time & all in the same manner?

It's not about getting your foil hat out, it's about believing a story which has defied the laws of Physics & Archchitecture for the 1st time in History...

3 times in a row all on the same day!!

Exactly, i think this thread should be thrown back into Films & Tv now, the truth couldn't be any clearer.

Some actually believe they brought down the twin towers because they were a mess & grey, all they needed was a lick of paint.

Gary i think your reading too much into this mate, arabs just aren't naturally born pilots, end of.

Thats another point to add!

http://911research.wtc7.net/disinfo/deceptions/badpilots.html

look at it from the other side - 2 planes hit identically built towers, at similar speeds, of similar weight, in about the same place causing very similar desctruction and damaged to the frame work of the building. what happened to 1 was always going to happen to the other.


those towers were SO tall yet so thin and narrow, built to (at the time) very close tollerances - AND you're suprised them being twatted by passenger jets made the fall down!?!?

Have you ever thought about a career change?

"The Man" wouldn't offer him a job. he's too dangerous.

so what you are saying is that in fact the towers fell faster than the laws of physics will allow?
fuck me the illuminati are cleverer than we all thought.
perhaps the lizard thing is true :-o

as for the beeb - why do you imagine they reported it early? I'm interested to see what you have deduced from this fact?

Well im suggesting the recall of all BBQ's in every single supermarket this summer, if not innocent peoples Gardens will be a wash with molten metal due to the apparent melting point of steel... or so it seems.

I didn't imagine anything?
The Tower is still standing whislt being reported as already collapsed. It's there for your own eyes to see!

and if it wasn't the clueless Arabs flying the plane who was it? oh yes it was radio controlled. None of the flight crew noticed that I suppose. Or were the people in the airport in on the conspiracy? did they all think it was ok for a plane to fill up with passengers with no one on the flight deck, taxi down the runway and take off? did no-one spot the kid with the remote control at the side of the runway?
Or had the entire flight crew been pursuaded that it was for the good of the rich and powerful that they should all sacrifice themselves for the greater good. Did no one notice the strips of white cloth tied around the heads of the pilots?